On the Environment and Nuclear Power

Last week, the United Nations (UN) released its latest study on climate change and said:

• “Scientists are observing changes in the Earth’s climate in every region and across the whole climate system…

• "It could take 20-30 years to see global temperatures stabilize.

• “But it is not just about temperature ... These include changes to wetness and dryness, to winds, snow and ice, coastal areas and oceans."

• Note: The UN's three-year analysis leveraged information from over 14,000 studies around the world.

Separately, comments from a UN Nuclear Power Technology Briefing included:

• “Nuclear power is an important source of low-carbon electricity and heat that contribute to attaining carbon neutrality ... Analyses indicate that the world’s climate objectives will not be met if nuclear technologies are excluded.

• "All forms of energy production pose risks and cause environmental and health impacts ... when assessed across a broad range of environmental indicators, nuclear power has one of the smallest impacts of any energy source.

• "Public acceptance is a key factor for the future of nuclear power ... public attitudes largely depend on the perception of the benefits and risks associated with nuclear power, but also of the benefits and risks of non-nuclear alternatives."

Nuclear Reactor Designs

OUR TAKE

• The socio-economic impact of climate change (health risks, insurance costs, business disruption, land impairment, etc.) will likely have more influence on policymakers and business leaders than discussions about increasing temperatures, rising sea levels, etc.

• Many approaches will be used to adapt to and mitigate the risks of environmental changes. Nuclear power is a part of the solution - and its use should become more broadly acceptable.

• Individuals can have a positive impact on the environment by eating healthier, wasting less, pursuing low-carbon approaches to transportation, and engaging in consumer/political activism.